One scene when a live BBC News was being broadcast has caused a storm in this subject area, where one time-honored, experienced news entertainer, Martine Croxall was apparently quietly resisting gender-
harmonious speech, which has been scripted into her autocue. The incident happened when the elite broadcaster was reading an item about the susceptibility of some people to heat-related ailments during the current heat in the UK.
As Croxall, citing research at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, started reading the following line on how pregnant people should care more about the heat, she stopped to read and shared a line-by-line readout of the statement.
But at a mid-sentence she interjected and put the correction in-the-air, saying, instead: Malcom Mistry, who was a part of the study, states that the elderly, pregnant individuals women, and those ailing of any pre-existing condition must exercise caution.
Blatant censoring by replacing the word women with people was met by a significant look towards the camera, which can be seen by many people as a definitive sign that the alteration was not an accidental
move but was somewhat of a self-statement. The video soon became viral with thousands of people reacting to it online and attracting national attention.
Amongst the other contributors included the best selling author J.K Rowling who has been in the limelight over her controversial arguments on gender identity and the rights of women.
She commended Croxall in a tweet (on X formerly Twitter) saying, “I never knew I would have a new favourite BBC presenter.” This remark elicited some rather heartfelt support and a fair share of severe criticism, with the controversy on the matter running high.
One of the hot debates of recent years revolves around the term pregnant people. It is not supposed to exclude transgender men and non-binary people who can possibly become pregnant.
Critics however respond to this by holding that this move of substituting the word women with gender neutral words in situations like during child birth or reproductive health is a practice that denies and negates the reality and particularity of the experience of women.
Croxall has already expressed her opinions in the past where she said in one on-air discussion with a trans activist that “sex is binary and immutable.” She expressed a different view in the off the script, which many perceive as an extension of her argument on the need to have biological definitions of sex.
Croxall wrote to her own social media afterward, to thank her many new followers who she said supported her since the clip went out on air. A tremendous thanks to all of you who have decided to
follow me today because of whatever reasons. She wrote, It was an adventure…” She also talked about the possible consequences stating that she was braced that the executives of the BBC would respond.
BBC itself has not yet made an official statement regarding the matter by the time of writing. It is yet to be seen whether there is going to be internal action as a result of the incident or whether it goes into a broader discussion of editorial language within the broadcaster.
The general issue of gender-inclusive language still remains a hot topic not only in the UK but all over the landscape. To other people, the airing decision of Croxall was a statement of precision and facts. To others, it was considered as being exclusionary and even detrimental to trans persons.
With discussions of identity, biology and inclusivity moving continually toward either poles, the edge in these conversations creates flashpoints and points of tension that human beings experience lurking just below the level of policy and politics.
How would you react to the situation? Log on to Facebook and share this story to get the reaction of other people.
Related